Je viens de repérer ce papier sur la thématique « la justice ». Avec plaisir nous vous en présentons le plus frappant dans cette publication.
Le titre (Justice Department requests protective order in Trump election interference case to limit his public comments) en dit long.
L’éditorialiste (annoncé sous le nom d’anonymat
) est connu et fiable.
Les révélations éditées sont donc réputées véritables.
Le post a été diffusé à une date indiquée 2023-08-05 18:58:00.
The Justice Department has asked a federal judge overseeing the criminal case against former President Donald Trump in Washington to step in after he released a post online that appeared to promise revenge on anyone who goes after him.
Prosecutors on Friday requested that U.S. District Court Judgeissue a protective order concerning evidence in the case, a day after Trump to charges of trying to overturn his 2020 election loss and block the peaceful transition of power. The order, different from a « gag order, » would limit what information Trump and his legal team about the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith.
Chutkan on Saturday gave Trump’s legal team until 5 p.m. Monday to respond to the government’s request. Trump’s legal team, which has indicated he would look to slow the case down despite prosecutors’ pledge of a speedy trial, then filed a request to extend the response deadline to Thursday and to hold a hearing on the matter, saying it needed more time for discussion.
Chutkan swiftly denied that extension request Saturday evening, reaffirming that Trump must abide by Monday’s deadline.
Protective orders are common in criminal cases, but prosecutors said it’s « particularly important in this case » because Trump has posted on social media about « witnesses, judges, attorneys, and others associated with legal matters pending against him. »
Prosecutors pointed specifically to a post on Trump’s Truth Social platform from earlier Friday in which Trump wrote, in all capital letters, « If you go after me, I’m coming after you! »
Prosecutors said they are ready to hand over a « substantial » amount of evidence — « much of which includes sensitive and confidential information » — to Trump’s legal team.
They told the judge that if Trump were to begin posting about grand jury transcripts or other evidence provided by the Justice Department, it could have a « harmful chilling effect on witnesses or adversely affect the fair administration of justice in this case. »
Prosecutors’ proposed protective order seeks to prevent Trump and his lawyers from disclosing materials provided by the government to anyone other than people on his legal team, possible witnesses, the witnesses’ lawyers or others approved by the court. It would put stricter limits on « sensitive materials, » which would include grand jury witness testimony and materials obtained through sealed search warrants.
A Trump spokesperson said in an emailed statement that the former president’s post « is the definition of political speech, » and was made in response to « dishonest special interest groups and Super PACs. »
Chutkan, a former assistant public defender nominated to the bench by President Barack Obama, has been one of the toughest punishers of rioters who stormed the Capitol in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack, fueled by Trump’s baseless claims of a stolen election.
The indictment unsealed this past week accuses Trump of brazenly conspiring with allies to spread falsehoods and concoct schemes intended to overturn his election loss to Democrat Joe Biden as his legal challenges floundered in court.
The indictment chronicles how Trump and his allies, in what Smith described as an attack on a « bedrock function of the U.S. government, » repeatedly lied about the results in the two months after he lost the election and pressured his vice president, Mike Pence, and state election officials to take action to help him cling to power.
Trump faces charges including conspiracy to defraud the U.S. and conspiracy to obstruct Congress’ certification of Biden’s electoral victory.
It’s the third criminal case brought this year against the early front-runner in the 2024 Republican presidential primary. But it’s the first case to try to hold Trump responsible for his efforts to remain in power during the chaotic weeks between his election loss and the attack by his supporters on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
Smith has also charged Trump in Florida federal court withat Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate and thwarting government efforts to get them back.
The magistrate judge, in that case, agreed to a protective order in June that prohibits Trump and his legal team from publicly disclosing evidence turned over to them by prosecutors without prior approval. Prosecutors are seeking another protective order in that case with more rules about the defense team’s handling of classified evidence.
Trump is scheduled to stand trial in March in the case brought by the Manhattan district attorneymade during the 2016 campaign. The Manhattan district attorney has Trump with 34 counts of falsifying business records.
Trump is scheduled to stand trial in May in the classified documents case.
After his court appearance on Thursday in the Washington case, Trump characterized the prosecution as a « persecution » designed to hurt his 2024 presidential campaign. His legal team has described it as an attack on his right to free speech and his right to challenge an election that he believed had been stolen.
Smith has said prosecutors will seek a « speedy trial » against Trump in the election case. Judge Chutkan has ordered the government to file a brief by Thursday proposing a trial date. The first court hearing in front of Chutkan is scheduled for Aug. 28.
Meanwhile, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis isa charging decision this month in her investigation into 2020 election interference in the state of Georgia. Road closures will take effect around the courthouse beginning next week in preparation, according to the Fulton County Sheriff’s Office.
Addressing the Alabama Republican Party summer dinner Friday night, Trump continued to escalate his rhetoric against Smith, calling him a « deranged, sick person, » and accusing federal and local prosecutors, without providing any proof, of « election interference. »
« Every one of these many fake charges filed against me by the corrupt Biden DOJ could have been filed two-and-a-half years ago, » Trump said. « But they waited and waited until I became a dominant force in the polls. »
Ahead of his appearance, the Trump campaign released a new ad dubbed the « Fraud Squad » which negatively depicts Smith, Willis and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. The ad is expected to run nationally, including in Washington, Atlanta and New York, according to a Trump aide.
Publications sur un sujet similaire:
Droit international public/Les actes juridiques non conventionnels,A voir et à lire. .
L’Art de l’enquête criminelle : À la recherche de la vérité, de la sécurité et de la justice,A voir et à lire. .
Pour lire Platon/Version imprimable,Le livre .
Le site auduc-avocat.com est fait afin de fournir différentes publications sur la thématique Avocat divorce publiées sur internet. auduc-avocat.com vous a concocté cet article qui informe du thème « Avocat divorce ». Ce texte a été réédité de la manière la plus complète qui soit. Si jamais vous souhaitez apporter quelques modifications concernant le domaine de « Avocat divorce » il est possible de d’échanger avec notre équipe. En visitant plusieurs fois notre blog vous serez au courant des prochaines annonces.